Keira Knightley stars in a PSA about Domestic Violence

4 04 2009

OK, so I may or may not be secretly in love with Keira, which makes it hard for me to hate this Public Service Announcement. Warning: this video can be triggering; it is a bit graphic.

I don’t have a problem that there is a PSA out there to try to speak out against domestic violence. It’s great that Keira signed up for this. However, I have always believed that the intentions behind something only goes far; what counts just as much, if not more…or a lot more, is what message is ACTUALLY sent out or the effects it  had.

Honestly, this PSA did not portray what DV is like at ALL. It is not some faceless guy beating up some beautiful actress on a set. It is someone that is very close to the victim; they know who the abuser is. The abuser’s face is very clear.  I honestly think the set up is kind of confusing; I probably would have doubted whether the ad was about domestic violence if the link didnt say it was.

That ties into another point that upsetted me. The main part that is very clear is Keira getting beaten. It’s shocking and unexpected and hard to watch. They’re sensationalizing another woman’s pain to try to promote a cause! The paradox makes my head want to explode. Watching 30 seconds of a woman being beat up with a short disclaimer at the end that is basically like, “p.s. don’t do this at home” just makes me think that it cant be effective.

The PSA is done by Women’s Aid, which “is the key national charity working to end domestic violence against women and children,” according to their site. I don’t think that this PSA could be helpful to women currently in abusive relationships. It seems to concentrate on shocking the people who are not familiar with domestic violence and asking them to donate two pounds a month.  I think instead of merely perpetuating normalization of violence against women in the media, the ad could have done more to perhaps reach out to the women currently being abused (I personally would not have felt encouraged to seek help by that ad, but probably would just want to hide).

I wish this short film was the center of the campaign by Women’s Aid. I think if they had something not based on shock value and violence to at least ACCOMPANY this ad, it would be more effective.





“Cut Back: Facing Ageism”

4 04 2009

Just a few minutes ago, I was lucky enough to click on the link from a commenter on this blog.  The commenter is Patricia Sahertian, and she provided a link with her comment on a recent post.  Since I’m a bit nosy, I always click these links, but they usually turn out to be useless advertisements.

However, this link really caught my attention.  Ms. Sahertian is the creative director of a documentary called “Cut Back:  Facing Ageism.”  She is an artist, and her work has appeared in Fine Art Magazine and home decor journals.  Although this is her first documentary, Sahertian’s extremely diverse accomplishments include work as a sculptor, painter, graphic designer, musical director, writer, and creator of book designs.  For a full list of her accomplishments and to view more info about Fight Ageism, click here.

Here’s the trailer for the film.

Sahertian’s film  provides personal accounts of ageism through interviews with a diverse group of individuals about their personal experiences with ageism.  The documentary also includes comments by attorneys, employment specialists, and other experts about the effects of age discrimination.  Sahertian traveled the US and Ireland, and filmed over 150 hours of footage, but the documentary is now finished and Sahertian is entering it in film festivals across the nation.

Discrimination against older people (Jeunism) is something that isn’t discussed nearly enough, especially in the college population.  But this form of discrimination affects our parents, our relatives, and will eventually someday affect us as well if we do not work to change the way people think about aging.  

And to make Sahertian’s project even cooler, she has painted gorgeous portraits of the individuals interviewed and is selling them on Etsy.com!  Check out her portraits and some information about the participants in the film here.

I want to thank Ms. Sahertian for commenting on the blog and for bringing her documentary to my attention.  I never thought I would actually write a post about one of the commenters, but ageism is an extremely pervasive form of discrimination that isn’t confronted nearly enough.  Ms. Sahertian’s documentary looks like a great way to learn about the very personal effects of age discrimination and to examine the ways that we think about age.





Mental Illness and Parenthood

4 04 2009

In an April 4th article entitled “Should I?” on Boston.com, Marya Hornbacher describes how her mental illness has affected her decision to have children.  She explains how she and her husband were in the middle of the adoption process when she had a massive depressive episode and lost her confidence in her ability to raise a child.  Her story provides excellent insight into the ways that mental illness affects women, although I am by no means suggesting that her experience is something that men would never have.

Hornbacher describes her feelings as she lay in the psych ward during a major depressive episode:

I was so sure, at that moment, that I was making the right decision. I believed, for that one life-changing instant, that I truly wasn’t capable of raising a child, that any child would be better off without me as its mother. Lying there in a hospital bed, the idea of taking care of something so fragile as a child, when I couldn’t even take care of myself, made my head spin. So I said no.

It was obvious: I wasn’t up for that kind of responsibility. Wasn’t reliable enough, was maybe too volatile to be trusted. Yes, maybe I had wanted it, but what about the best interest of the child? That day, I, like a whole lot of people, believed that mental illness really did disqualify me as a parent.

Now, I’m not so sure.

Hornbacher relates one of the major concerns of most expectent parents, or those people thinking about becoming parents: Will I be good enough to raise a child?  In this case, it’s clear that Hornbacher’s insecurities about her abilities to parent stem, as far as she can tell, from her bipolar disorder.

She describes how she first coped with the disorder:

Like a great many people with mental illness, I resisted my diagnosis – who wants to believe they’re mentally ill? – and with it resisted the medication that would make it manageable. And like about half of people with bipolar, I struggled with substance abuse for years. For someone with a mental illness, drinking and doing drugs is like pouring gas on an already smoldering fire.

Here, she also reveals a connection between mental illness and drug abuse; when you’re mentally ill, sometimes drugs can seem like good ways to cope with mental illness.  It’s also important to remember that there’s no such thing as a “bad” coping mechanism; there are unhealthy ones, to be sure, and substance abuse is one of them.  But Hornbacher’s resistance to the diagnosis also speaks to the stigma that comes with mental illness; she tried to manage her illness in an effort to convince herself and others that she was fine.

She explains what it’s like to be mentally ill in a society where mental illness is an invisible marker:

This means that, in most ways, I’ve left behind the chaos of my earlier life and joined the ranks of “normal.” People who manage their mental illness are all around you, and you probably don’t know it, because they look and act just like you. They go to work, buy groceries, drink lattes, and have kids. That’s what’s funny – I imagine a whole lot of people would think I’d make a great mom, right up till the moment they learned I have a mental illness.

Her use of quotation marks around the word “normal” is extremely revealing; her description places mental illness very clearly among other forms of identity that aren’t considered normal.  Mental illness, like queer sexuality, it something that tends to be invisible until someone discloses it; then, opinions may change.  As Hornbacher said above, people might think she’d make a fantastic parent so long as they weren’t aware of her mental illness.  She has to hide behind the “normal” facade in order to be considered acceptable as a member of society and as a parent.  This is not to suggest that she and others with mental illness shouldn’t receive treatment and find coping mechanisms that help them lead happy lives.  Instead, the perceptions of mental illness and the social ostracization are what become problematic. Hornbacher could be the best parent to ever exist on the face of the planet, but as long as people know she is mentally ill, she won’t be recognized as a capable parent.

While signing books after a lecture on her memoir, Hornbacher recalls a woman who was surprised to find that she (Hornbacher) was married, and practically relieved to learn that there were no kids in the picture:

Apparently I hadn’t quite made my point. Because after 45 minutes of going on about the facts that mental illness is highly treatable, that one can live and live well when one has it, and that my life as a mentally ill person is really quite average, she’d come away with: mentally ill people are so warped that it’s a miracle anyone can stand being married to them, let alone allow them to inflict themselves on a baby.

While it is disconcerting and disappointing that this woman completely missed the point of the lecture, it’s certainly a very clear description of perceptions of the mentally ill.  It also demonstrates how social attitudes continue to plague people with mental illness, even if they themselves might have been working very hard to cope with both their illnesses and their perceptions about their personal illnesses.

Hornbacher also examines how reproductive rights factor into the issue:

When people with uncontrolled mental illness have kids, those kids do feel the effects, and it’s a serious struggle for both parent and child. But unless we want to skate dangerously close to the suggestion that those people should not be “allowed” to have children – a suggestion that leads ultimately to an argument for eugenics – “we” are not in a position to say that they can’t have kids.

I would venture to say that many people start having children without deeply thinking it through, and without being particularly well-prepared. Who allows them to do this? Well, that’s not really the question. We sigh and say, God, there should really be a test. But we’re joking.

Her sentiments are not only very clearly expressed, but also reflected in the experiences of many other women and would-be parents affected by eugenics, or at least eugenicist attitudes.  Who is to determine whether or not someone who is mentally ill, black, mentally retarded, or poor should have kids?  After all, there are plenty of white, upper-class people with no mental illness or retardation who make terrible parents.  Hornbacher also describes her experience growing up with a parents with mental illness, and while she acknowledges that it was sometimes difficult to be a child of a person with mental illness, her father was a great parent, and that what she takes away from the relationship is positive.

Hornbacher ends her piece with her own uncertainty:

I sometimes have this dream where I am holding a thing, and then it floats away, and I get this weird weightless ache in my arms. Then I wake up and listen to the silence. It is the noisy silence of the ghost of the 5-year-old I chose not to raise. Is anyone raising her?

You often hear people with mental illness who have children described as “selfish.” There’s the perception that someone like me would have kids only to serve my own needs. But maybe the decision I made was the selfish one. My arms are empty. And my burden is very light.

I find her final paragraph incredibly moving and disquieting at the same time.  How are people with mental illness “selfish” for having children, while those without illness aren’t?  Hornbacher wasn’t planning to have biological childen; she and her husband were adopting.  If she’s not passing on her genes, is she still a bad parent?  Are parents free of mental illness necessarily better parents?  What does this reflection say about how mentally ill people are treated in a culture where the “other” is marginalized?

For more insight, check out the article, and especially check out the comments.